Test taken: MML Test

Number of interviews: 2

Skype interview: No

Time between interviews: They were on the same day

My first interview, "ab initio" Italian, started by discussing an English text which I had just spent 30 minutes reading and preparing before the interview. I didn't understand half of it. I wasn't even doing English Literature as part of my A-Levels, so I was very lost. Nevertheless, I had heard that in the interviews you are meant to think out loud, so I just said whatever came to mind. My interviewers actually seemed really interested to hear my ideas, however far-fetched, and I actually enjoyed the experience of being able to discuss a subject with people who were experts in their field.

We also discussed my motivations for studying Italian and language more generally. And they also asked me to read aloud a passage from an Italian poem, just so they could hear how I pronounced the language I guess. I got plenty of pronunciations wrong, and was corrected many times, so I didn't feel too good about that one.

My German 'post A-level' interview was similar in structure. We discussed the German passage I had been set to prepare, and my interviewers also asked me to read it aloud to judge my pronunciation. The reading aloud was the only part that took place in German, the rest was in English. This could be different for everyone though.

I also got plenty of questions about the passage wrong. I think the important thing again was that I thought out loud, and I was able to understand why my answers were wrong. Or something like that.

The rest of the questions centered on my personal statement, and were about stuff like my interest in linguistics (I had said that I was on my personal statement) and what I knew about it.

Both interviews were really relaxed, and while I was obviously very nervous beforehand, my interviewers made me feel at ease, and I came out having actually enjoyed the experience, even though I was equally convinced I hadn't gotten in.

I didn't really do too much to prepare, other than revising grammar and making sure I had read the books on my personal statement. I had an admissions test after the interview, and the grammar really came in handy there, even though I could have done with revising vocab too (I forgot the word for author in a task that asked me to write about the author's opinion lol). One thing I did find helpful though, was watching YouTube videos about the interviews. Cambridge has a video titled "the interview" which was really helpful.

The interviewers are not expecting you to know the answer. Like, at all. At least for my subject. What they are most interested in is seeing how you think, and whether you are teachable. So, when you get an answer wrong, are you able to take in the right answer and the feedback and understand why you were wrong.

The number one piece of advice I would give prospective students is to think out loud. Say whatever comes to mind, even if you think it's ridiculous and stupid. Because if the interviewers don't know how and what you're thinking, they're also not able to help you.

It's also important to remember that the interview is only one part of the application process, and it's really difficult to tell how it went afterwards. Just try to enjoy the experience. Afterall you get to have a discussion with leading experts in a field that interests you, make the best out of it!

I wish I hadn't worried so much about having to speak German to the interviewers. I has watched a recreated German interview from Cambridge on YouTube, and freaked myself out by all the grammar exercises the applicant had to do, and how she seemed to speak fluent German. I was also excessively worried that me not having actually been to Germany was going to be an issue (which of course it wasn't).