I had two interviews of about 20 minutes, each with two interviewers. The first was based around my personal statement and the second on an article we had been given a week or two beforehand. There was a bit of time in between the two interviews, where we could sit in the waiting area but I found it a bit stressful so went to a nearby cafe instead.

The personal statement interview was tricky - a few times one interviewer kept asking me the same question, trying to get me to get to a specific answer (which I never did - what's probably more important was that I tried). They also asked me about things I'd written in my SAQincluding topics I'd done in English (I'd argued in my personal statement about the importance of literary texts as historical sources) so be just be aware of that!

The article interview was better I think - I'd really recommend preparing for this one quite a bit, as there's a lot you can think about in advance: try thinking about what's the article arguing, what sources does it use and how does it use them, do you have any criticisms of the article etc. You're allowed to bring the article to the interview so highlight things and make notes in the margins (I didn't look at them much but it really calmed my nerves knowing they were there). I got a relatively normal historical article but some people got some weird ones - don't be thrown off!

If you're stuck don't worry about it - I got stuck loads, but as long as you try and explain your thought process that's just as good as getting the 'right' answer.